Success Stories About Us Mission Statement Staff Board of Directors Junior Board 04-05 Annual Report Job and Volunteer Opportunities Funders Pro Bono AFC's Pro Bono Partners Pro Bono Opportunities for Attorneys Donate Contact Us Privacy Policy Our Work Overview AFC Services Projects Litigation D.S. v NYC DOE J.G. v Mills L.V. v DOE E.B. v DOE Push-Out Trilogy Jose P. v Mills LIH v BOE Ray M. v NYC BOE BOE v NYC BOE Resources for Parents Parent Guides AFC Services Dept. of Ed. Contacts Referral List Links Contact Us Resources for Professionals Policy Reports Litigation Dept. of Ed. Contacts Contact Us Publications Parent Guides Policy Reports Brochures Newsletters Press Room AFC in the News Request an Interview Press Releases Contact Us Ways To Help DONATE DIRECTLY DONATE BY SEARCHING OR SHOPPING DONATE IN HONOR OF _________________________

J.G. v. Mils AFC, the Legal Aid Society of New York and Dewey Ballantine LLP have filed a class action suit on behalf of a class of students aged 7-21 who have a history of involvement with the juvenile or adult court systems and who are entitled to an education in New York City schools. All the plaintiffs in this action claim that upon being released from a court-ordered setting, they have been denied timely re-enrollment in New York City schools. The students claim that court-involved youth are regularly denied the opportunity to return to school or warehoused in alternative settings where court-involved youth are segregated and that do not afford them minimally adequate educational services. The complaint also contains allegations on behalf of two subclasses: court-involved youth with disabilities and class members who did not receive adequate educational services while in detention in New York City. Richard Mills, Commissioner of the New York State Education Department, as well as Joel Klein, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education are named as Defendants in the suit. The case is pending in the Eastern District of New York before Judge Allyne Ross and Magistrate Judge Steven Gold. Selected Documents: J.G. v. Mills Complaint - December 14, 2004 First Amended Complaint - February 4, 2005 Second Amended Complaint - February 8, 2005 Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Class Certification - December 17, 2004 Selected Declarations and Exhibits in Support of Class Certification Notice of Motion and Declarations - December 8, 2004 Godsoe Declaration - December 16, 2004 Hyman Declaration - December 17, 2004 Rosenbloom Declaration - December 16, 2004 Owens Declaration - December 16, 2004 Exhibits A-I, J-P, Q-U, V-BB Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ and Proposed Intervenors’ Motion to Intervene, Amend the Complaint and in Support of a TRO and Preliminary Injunction - February 8, 2004 Exhibit CC1 Exhibit CC2 Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of a Preliminary Injunction - September 19, 2005 Exhibits in Support of Preliminary Injunction Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E(a)(i), Exhibit E(a)(ii), Exhibit E(a)(iii), Exhibit E(a)(iv), Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H, Exhibit I, Exhibit J, Exhibit K, Exhibit L, Exhibit M, Exhibit N, Exhibit O(a), Exhibit O(b), Exhibit O(c), Exhibit O(d), Exhibit O(e), Exhibit P(a), Exhibit P(b), Exhibit P(c), Exhibit P(d), Exhibit Q(a)(i), Exhibit Q(a)(ii), Exhibit Q(a)(iii), Exhibit Q(a)(iv), Exhibit Q(a)(v), Exhibit Q(a)(vi), Exhibit Q(b)(i), Exhibit Q(b)(ii), Exhibit Q(c)(i), Exhibit Q(c)(ii), Exhibit Q(c)(iii), Exhibit Q(c)(iv), Exhibit Q(c)(v), Exhibit Q(d), Exhibit Q(e), Exhibit Q(f), Exhibit R(a), Exhibit R(b)(i), Exhibit R(b)(ii), Exhibit R(b)(iii), Exhibit R(b)(iv), Exhibit R(c)(i), Exhibit R(c)(ii), Exhibit R(c)(iii), Exhibit R(c)(iv), Exhibit R(c)(v), Exhibit R(d), Exhibit R(e), Exhibit R(f), Exhibit R(g), Exhibit R(h), Exhibit R(i), Exhibit R(j), Exhibit R(k), Exhibit R(l), Exhibit R(m), Exhibit R(n), Exhibit R(o), Exhibit R(p), Exhibit R(q), Exhibit R(r), Exhibit R(s), Exhibit S(a), Exhibit S(b), Exhibit T(a), Exhibit T(b), Exhibit U(a), Exhibit V(a), Exhibit W(a), Exhibit W(b), Exhibit X(a), Exhibit X(b), Exhibit X(c), Exhibit X(d), Exhibit Y, Exhibit Z, Exhibit AA, Exhibit BB City and State's Reply to P.I. City Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction State Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction Declaration of Pat Schubert in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction P.I. Decision Report and Decision - July 6, 2006